Festival dossier
Kiruna, Sweden · Est. 1991 · Established legitimate festival with meaningful track record
Solid signals — do normal diligence
Tier B looks established enough for many filmmakers. Check fees, programming fit, and recent editions before submitting.
The theme of the films submitted must thematically depict issues related to the environment, sustainability and/or the environment. The films must be shot in the defined geographical area. Which is; Norway: Finnmark, Troms (incl.. Svalbard) and Nordland Finland: Lapland, North Ostrobothnia, North Karelia and Kainuu Sweden: Norrbotten and Västerbotten Iceland Greenland Russia: Murmansk, Arkhangelsk, Nenets, Komi and Karelia Canada: Yukon, Northwest Territory, Nunavut USA: Alaska
Last updated Sep 19, 2026
Founded
1991
Synced 4 days ago
Rating synced from FilmFreeway; individual review text not pulled yet for this festival.
View on FilmFreewayFilmFreeway reviews are filmmaker opinions, not our score. Cross-check red flags before paying fees.
Live web research is off to control API cost. This shows cached scheduled research when available, plus analysis from our database.
Hard research (cheap model + thorough prompt) runs on a cron for suspicious festivals; a biweekly job refreshes others. No live API calls from the site.
Scores are calculated from structural indicators: accreditations, physical screenings, award category count, submission frequency, and acceptance rate. Higher scores reflect more verifiable legitimacy signals.
No community reviews yet. If you submitted here, your experience helps others avoid award mills.
Write a reviewOr report a problem →Get notified when Arctic Light Filmfestival's tier changes or new reports are filed.
Filmmakers and festival teams can propose listing corrections or submit verified evidence. Verified evidence can change a tier, but it is weighed alongside every other flag on this listing.
Request a correction